The record

Published to sector and shape.

Names, geographies, figures and dates are withheld under the terms of each engagement. What is published is the condition, the examination and what the board received.

01 / Engagements

Three organisations others operate on top of.

01 / Telecommunications

A listed telecommunications group

The condition presented

A network programme resourced twice, with the second attempt described internally as a delivery problem. The executive team reported alignment on the programme.

What was examined

Board packs and minutes against the working chart. Sessions across the executive team and the layer below it, mapped to what each person perceived, understood and projected.

What the record showed

The programme carried two definitions of completion, held in different functions and reconciled nowhere. Neither function was withholding. The definitions had separated before either was written down.

What the board received

A dated causal chain, the five layers scored, and a register of adjustments with named owners and completion indicators a third party could verify.

02 / Ports and logistics

A global ports and logistics operator

The condition presented

Senior departures read individually over two cycles, each with a separate explanation. Exit interviews cited fit and pace rather than a named condition.

What was examined

The exit record read as evidence rather than as reporting. Escalation routes traced from the operating level upward, and the time taken for an issue to be acknowledged at each step.

What the record showed

Escalation had a route and no stated time to acknowledge. Issues were carried informally by people whose bonus depended on the function they were escalating past.

What the board received

The same four documents, and a quarterly re-scoring of the register reported independently of the executive it measures.

03 / Construction and engineering

An international construction and engineering group

The condition presented

Three reorganisations across a single reporting line, each announced as the remedy for the last. Structure had been the answer often enough to be doubted as the cause.

What was examined

A dated timeline of the three reorganisations, traced four levels past the symptom, with active failures separated from the latent conditions that preceded all three.

What the record showed

Decision rights had been redrawn each time and delegated authority had not moved with them. The structure changed. What a person could actually approve did not.

What the board received

A finding written as system statements, carrying no individual name, and an embedding protocol with a declared schedule for withdrawing support.

Published to sector and shape. Each entry describes the condition and the examination. Figures, dates, geographies and identifying detail are withheld, and the absence of a figure is a term of the engagement rather than an absence of one.

02 / Worked examples

Three patterns, modelled and priced.

Composites, built to show how a condition carries a cost. Each is modelled from a recurring pattern rather than drawn from one engagement.

Composite A

Three readings of one strategy

The presenting problem

Quarterly targets missed three times against heavy investment. Functions attributing the miss to each other. A restructure under consideration that would have removed two executives.

What the sessions showed

The chief executive held one strategy, the chief operating officer a second and the chief commercial officer a third. Explicit disagreement between them was absent from every record.

The cost of the condition

Duplicated investment and resource conflict modelled at US$38m a month. The finding moved the discussion from alignment as a value to alignment as a number.

What changed the argument

Fourteen decisions over 22 months, traced and dated, each one defensible under the strategy its owner believed was in force.

Composite B

Silence, priced

The presenting problem

Four years of internal audits passed with perfect marks. A chief risk officer describing the operational silence as too clean to be accurate.

What the sessions showed

A concern raised publicly five years earlier had been answered publicly and badly. The lesson the organisation drew was that raising a concern carries a professional cost.

The cost of the condition

Seventeen compliance issues downgraded before reaching the executive layer, three of them active, carrying combined regulatory exposure modelled at US$90m.

What changed the argument

The audits were accurate. They recorded what was reported, and what was reported had been shaped by a single incident that had gone unconnected to it.

Composite C

The curated brief

The presenting problem

Senior departures accelerating ahead of a listing. Exit interviews citing cultural friction, with the specifics absent from every one of them.

What the sessions showed

Raised problems were met with an immediate answer rather than a question. Disagreement was met with questioning that ran until the other party conceded. Both patterns were visible in the calendar.

The cost of the condition

Talent loss and the decisions taken on curated data modelled at US$12m to US$18m a month, with direct replacement cost a small fraction of it.

What changed the argument

The behaviour was not concealed and had been described as decisiveness. What it produced was a leadership team presenting the version that ended the conversation quickest.

Composites. Modelled from recurring patterns rather than drawn from a single engagement. The figures are illustrative, describe no client and identify no organisation.

03 / Next

Discretion is a term of the work. Thin proof is a different problem, and this page separates the two.

Where an engagement permits a figure in writing, it is published with the client attributed. Until then the record carries sector and shape.

Request a preliminary report Run the alignment diagnostic